The following questions and statements were shared on our facebook page. Since John doesn't have a short answer, he decided to
reply to Larry's post on our blog. Here is a copy of Larry's
facebook post:
“In
a conversation I had with John he made the statement that I
understood to mean the church was not true, that the leadership had
no authority, that all leaders of the LDS church since Joseph Smith
Jr. were false leaders. With that in mind how would you interpret his
standing with that Organization? All have the right to believe in
who, what they would like. I have seen the the verse D and C 124: 28
quoted as the proof that the higher priesthood was taken away. If you
will read the verses before that you will see that the membership of
the church were being called to build a temple for the reason stated
in verse 28. I was ask where in the scriptures that these things were
restored. Perhaps D and C 127: verse 8 Might shed a little light on
the subject. You may believe what You would like. I testify that the
priesthood was restored and has remained on the earth since Joesph
Smith Jr. received it. If you would like to discuss this more you
know how to reach me. Come and visit if you would like Your friend
Larry ( PS If I have missed understood any thing then I apologize. )”
Here
is John's response:
Larry,
thank you for your thoughtful comments, statements, and testimony. I
appreciate your understanding of the scriptures, your devout desire
to serve God, and your friendship to me. I really appreciate your
willingness to talk with me and openly discuss more about the gospel.
There is no apology necessary – it is pleasant to visit with you.
I
respect the LDS Church, the leadership, fellow members, and the much
good that has been promoted. By way of the LDS Church, I have been
blessed to receive truth, ordinances, the Book of Mormon, scriptures,
prophecies, and the Word of God. I am everlastingly grateful for my
membership and standing in the LDS church, my process of learning and
understanding the Word of God, and for everything I have experienced
thereof.
TRUE
CHURCH:
The
Church truly does exist and plays an important role in the latter
days. However, the LDS Church is NOT completely true because the
institution and men within it teach and advance both truth and error.
I value the truth promoted, but choose to reject the false and vain
and foolish doctrines and traditions of men. Even current Church
statements found on LDS.org and the official LDS Church position on
Polygamy and Race & Priesthood (among many other things) is
shifting like sand under our feet. The LDS Church increasingly
appears to be just another mainstream religion. With greater
frequency the LDS hierarchy, professors, and general membership are
all wrong; their creeds are an abomination in His
sight; professors are corrupt; and “they draw near to me with their
lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the
commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the
power thereof.” JSH 1:19
God
is a God of truth and knows what He is doing. D&C 93:26 Men are
not of truth and do not know what they are doing, unless they are
connected with God and commune with Jehovah, as did Joseph Smith and
all true and living prophets of God. Because the preservation of
truth restored through Joseph Smith is decreasing, and the errors of
men are increasing in the LDS Church, I believe the LDS Church is
becoming less true. It is becoming increasingly false because it
progressively embraces incorrect notions and false tenets.
The
words “Having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof”
is very revealing when a person is identifying true or false
religions. An actual prophet of God, or the members of the true
church of God will most certainly possess power from God Himself.
Here
is what Elder
Boyd K. Packer
said, at least in part, about the LDS Church during the April 2010
General Conference? Elder Packer talked about the church's lack of
ability to disseminate power among the saints. Why is the church
unable to disseminate power? Why was the church able to spread and
distribute authority under common consent but not the power of God?”
The words recorded in
D&C 121:36
can be enlightening and answer these questions. "That the
rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of
heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor
handled only upon the principles of righteousness." If a man is
not connected with the powers of heaven, is it possible for him to
possess the rights of the priesthood or power from on high?
Does this scripture provide us with a solution to the dilemma that Elder Packer described? Is there a distinction between authority and power? Is Elder Packer trying to tell us something? Is he giving us notice of something very essential and fundamental that is missing in the current state of the LDS Church? If the fullness of the priesthood has been lost or forfeited, can the remaining lesser priesthood bind or seal? Is it possible that many in the church teach one perspective of priesthood power, but the scriptures and the Word of God teach quite another? Is it necessary for God to personally bestow the priesthood with His own voice? Or is it sufficient for men to confer priesthood upon others by the laying on of hands from one generation to another? Is the priesthood or the association with men different than the priesthood or association with God? Why or why not? Does it matter? Alma 13:1 JST Genesis 14:25-40
The
angel , who spoke to Nephi, taught key truths concerning the true
church of God in contrast to the many false and abominable churches
in the world. Nephi wrote, “And he said unto me: Behold there are
save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and
the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not
to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church,
which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the
earth.” 1 Nephi 14:10
Taking
the words of the angel as the Word of God, wouldn't it seem wise to
belong to the church of the Lamb of God (the true church) and discard
all others? Is the LDS Church considered to be the church of the Lamb
of God? If so, why is there a lack of power within the church as
Elder Packer described? If not, does that make the LDS Church another
great and abominable church of the devil? Does the LDS population
possess power from God or mere authority by common consent of the
people? Is there a difference? Does it matter?
LEADERSHIP
AUTHORITY:
Concerning
LDS leadership authority, here is my perspective: Both past and
current leadership of the LDS Church were voted in by the people by
common consent, therefore, they have the right and authority to lead
the LDS Church organization.
Here
is a quote from Brigham
Young:
"Perhaps
it may make some of you stumble, were I to ask you a question - Does
a man's being a Prophet in this Church prove that he shall be the
President of it ? I answer, no ! A man may be a Prophet, Seer, and
Revelator, and it may have nothing to do with his being the President
of the Church. Suffice it to say, that Joseph was the President of
the Church, as long as he lived; the people chose to have it so. He
always filled that responsible station by the voice of the people.
Can you find any revelation appointing him the President of the
Church? The keys of the Priesthood were committed to Joseph to build
up the Kingdom of God on the earth, and were not be taken from him in
time or in eternity; but when he was called to preside over the
Church, it was by the voice of the people; though he held the keys of
the Priesthood, independent of their voice." Journal of
Discourses 1:133.
I
am fully content that the LDS hierarchy runs the Church under common
consent of the membership according to the dictates of their own
conscience. However, if and whenever I am able to identify
priestcraft or error in the LDS Church, leadership, or hierarchy,
which runs contrary to past prophets, scriptures, and the Word of
God, I feel no obligation or sensible reason to follow the promoted
falsehood or error. I see no wisdom in following a man or teaching a
“herd of people” to follow a blind man off a cliff to
destruction. My belief and practice is to embrace the truth of God
and reject the errors of men.
My
friend, Larry, referred to a key scripture that certainly offers
additional light and understanding to each of us. D&C 127:8
reads as follows: “For I am about to restore many things to the
earth, pertaining to the priesthood, saith the Lord of Hosts.” At
this specific point in time, the Lord offered much to the saints,
including the restoration of the fullness of the priesthood, Zion,
and more. “For I deign to reveal unto my church things which have
been kept hid from before the foundation of the world, things that
pertain to the dispensation of the fulness of times.” D&C124:41 The revelation found in D&C 127, which Larry referred to,
was dated September 1, 1842. This falls right in the middle of a “key
time-frame” and offer from the Lord. This revelation is dated
nearly twenty months after the D&C 124 revelation and almost
twenty-two months before the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith, on June
27, 1844.
From
the time God instructed and offered the saints another chance to
receive the fullness of the priesthood D&C 124:25-48 to the time
Joseph, Hyrum, and the Holy Priesthood were taken out of their midst,
nearly forty-two months had passed away.
The
saints had about 3 ½ years to receive God's offer by fulfilling His
command. “But I command you, all ye my saints, to build a house
unto me; and I grant unto you a sufficient time to build a house unto
me.” D&C 124:31 Having a sufficient time, were they
successful?
History reveals that around midnight on 8–9 October 1848, the Nauvoo Temple was set on fire. On 27 May 1850, the temple was struck by a tornado. In February 1865 Nauvoo's City Council ordered the final demolition of the last standing portion of the temple. Soon afterwords, all evidence of the temple disappeared. It was utterly destroyed. What message does this convey to you? Does that sound like a spot that was made holy?
Did the hand of God protect the saints? Did they receive the offered restoration or did they get moved out of their place and driven from Nauvoo? Why? D&C 124:45 Did they witness blessings and protection from God or did they experience cursings, wrath, indignation, and judgments? D&C 124:48 Did they find peace, glory, and power from heaven, or were they driven into the wilderness like the children of Israel?
Was Joseph taken from their midst like Moses was taken from the children of Israel? Were they left only with the lesser priesthood? D&C 84:25-26 Did they succeed in finding Zion or did they obtain less? Did they receive conversations with heaven, revelations, glory, honor, and endowments from the Lord? Did they find the Nauvoo temple to be the place where God came to them, talked to them, and ministered to them? Did He reveal His ordinances unto them and things that had been kept hid from before the foundation of the world pertaining to dispensation of the fullness of times? D&C 124:39-41 Did the Lord perform the oath and fulfill the promises that they expected at his hands? D&C 124:47
Did God restore that which was offered? Why or why not? Did the saints receive Zion? Was the fullness of the Priesthood restored after it was lost as recorded in D&C 124:28 dated January 19, 1841? If it has since been restored, when did it happen? Where did it occur? By whom was it restored? Upon whom was it conferred? Are there any scriptures, revelations, or records whatsoever containing the Word of God testifying that the Holy Priesthood was restored after 1841 and remains today with the latter day saints? I would be appreciative to know of any such evidence? Where does the LDS Church stand today regarding truth, redemption, priesthood, and power from God? Is it important to you to find out the truth concerning this subject? Does it matter?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for posting