We
are continuing on from the last post where we discussed the
overwhelming divergence, variation, and contradictions that are
repeatedly manifested among the latter day “prophets”. This has
forced us to face and confront a rather messy situation where
confusion, opposition, and contention is present.
How
can multiple “prophets”, all claiming to speak for God,
contradict one another? Does God change from moment to moment? Or do
some or perhaps almost all of the “prophets” deceive or lie?
What
is required to become a servant of God who speaks His word, which
“shall not pass away, but shall all be fulfilled, whether by mine
own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same?” (D&C 1:38)
Is
there a difference between a “holy man”, who is guided by the
Holy Spirit and speaks the word of God, and a “natural man”, who
simply relies on the “arm of flesh”? If so, what?
Is
it necessary for a servant of God to first be redeemed from the fall,
become a holy man, be brought back into His presence, literally know
Him face to face, become His witness, and deliver a message, for
which God vouches?
If
this is true, who, among the latter day “prophets”, do you
believe and trust? Can the words and teachings of a man, who claims
to be a modern or current prophet today, supersede or contradict the
words and teachings of the prophet Joseph Smith or any other previous
prophet or the scriptures, for which God vouches?
Is there someone today, who has come from the presence of God with an authorized message, calling repentance, seeking to preserve what was restored through the prophet Joseph Smith, declaring that the heavens are open for business, revealing a covenant from God, and seeking to prepare some few for Zion.
Joseph Smith was a true Prophet. Any who contradict Joseph are fools. None among current leaders is his peer. There are men today who speak God's words, mostly obscure individuals ignored or persecuted.
ReplyDeleteJames Russell Uhl