The
LDS Church has a product they call “Mormonism” and is trying to
sell it to the world. The target market of non-members or those who
have not yet been converted are becoming ever more disinterested in
it. As saving doctrines, ordinances, and the “living” church
fades away, sincere interest declines and genuine wonder and
involvement progressively perishes.
Currently,
LDS members, who are “active” and represent the key customers
that produce cash-flow for the corporation, are experiencing drastic
doctrinal changes. Some of these radical moves include altering
temple rites, twisting the doctrine of polygamy 180 degrees, and
changing and removing scriptures. Here's a few quick details:
Major
changes, including penalty removal, were made in 1990 to the temple ordinances and additional significantly important alterations in 2005 and 2016. In addition to the revised temple
ordinances, the sacrament ordinance has been changed and contradicts
Christ’s instructions and example given in three books of
scripture.
During
Brigham's presidency and into the 1900's, practicing polygamy was
taught as a hinge upon which salvation was connected. Today, on the
other hand, the church teaches that those who practice polygamy are
living in apostasy and may likely face excommunication. Interesting change?!
The
1835 Doctrine and Covenants included the Lectures on Faith, which
represented the “doctrine” portion, and were accepted as
scripture by common consent of church members. In 1921, a committee
of six apostles chose to remove the Lectures on Faith from the
Doctrine and Covenants WITHOUT common consent of the members. These
six men, on their own accord, left the covenants to remain, but took
away the entire doctrine portion, which teaches a man how to attain
sufficient faith to claim eternal life, literally know the Lord, and
see His face.
Other
changes include revamping the doctrine of Christ and the
qualifications for baptism (Children of same-sex couples are
currently being denied baptism by the Mormon church until they are 18
years old and meet church requirements.) and using tithes and sacred
funds to finance Babylon in all its glory, including the City Creek
Mall adjacent to temple square, high end developments, real estate,
investments, high rise condominiums, universities, ranches, and a
290,000 acre self contained city in Florida planned to house 500,000
people, which is in process.
Some
members are disturbed by these jarring moves and measures executed by
the “Brethren” and feel somewhat discouraged and lost. Some are angry, feel betrayed, lied to, and rejected. Others have noticed very
little, if anything. Despite all the major adjustments to LDS doctrine
and the troubling history that clearly shows the LDS church is
riddled with contradictions, many true-blue “Mormons” are still
“hanging on” and remain loyal customers to the corporation.
Although
damaged by mistakes, errors, and foolishness, while trying to hide
and cover the real but often embarrassing history, the LDS
institution has maintained some control and order and has managed to
convince many of their loyal followers to stay, pay, and obey.
Perhaps
this is accomplished as the church cuts back to very basic tenets,
drastically dilutes its teachings, changes ordinances, and
“guarantees” the loyal tithe payer that the radical changes were
inspired by God and the church cannot lead its faithful customers
astray.
The
remote possibility of the LDS church being in apostasy, at least from
the institution's point of view, is out of question, not possible,
and should never even be considered. That would not only be
“blasphemy”, but it could be devastating to our clever plan and
confiscate our “sacred income”. If the majority of church members
were to wake up and began to actually believe and see that the LDS
church is presently under condemnation (D&C 84:54-58) and is
currently experiencing an increasing state of apostasy, then the
church population and loyalty to the institution could essentially
evaporate over night. Church leadership is well aware of the potential near approaching "tipping point" and concerned
that if too many members begin to fully comprehend the fact that the
LDS church and Christ are not the same thing, but instead are rapidly
becoming complete polar opposites, it would prove to interrupt and
sever cash-flow and to threaten and possibly destroy the entire
conglomeration; investments, profits, and “prophets” alike!
That
being the case, there are two key LDS tenets that have and, from the
church leadership's point of view, must continue to supersede all
others: 1) the church is led by a “living prophet” and 2) the
“Upper Hierarchy” of church leaders have a standard of infallibility
and “cannot lead you astray.” During the past century, these
particular LDS beliefs have overgrown excessively and turned into
traditions of men, which has taken away light and truth from the
children of men. These false traditions, which have been embraced for
an entire lifetime by some individuals, appear to be right and good rather than
incorrect and in error. Therefore, these untrue traditions are
certainly difficult to overcome because they are “set in concrete”
and run deep and cold. They are seldom challenged, but if someone
begins to question or “rock the boat”, shunning and discipline
surely follows!
To
show a real life “shifting of sand under our feet” example of
several “prophets” declaring doctrine on a specific subject at
different periods of time, I have gathered various official
statements concerning “racism” and “priesthood” from the LDS
church leaders in three different time frames, including the early
days 1800's, semi recent past 1900's, and current statements found on
the church website. Coupled with the statements below are a few questions
that you may want to consider and ponder:
"We
condemn racism, including any and all past racism by individuals both
inside and outside the Church." (Official Church Statement)
In
2006, then Church president Gordon B. Hinckley declared that “no
man who makes disparaging remarks concerning those of another race
can consider himself a true disciple of Christ."
"Shall
I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white
man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of
Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This
will always be so." (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses,Volume 10, page 110)
"And
if any man mingle his seed with the seed of Cain the only way he
could get rid of it or have Salvation would be to come forward and
have his head cut off and spill his blood upon the ground- it would
also take the life of his children." (Wilford Woodruff Journal)
"Not
only was Cain called upon to suffer, but because of his wickedness he
became the father of an inferior race. A curse placed upon him and
that curse has been continued through his lineage and must do so
while time endures. Millions of souls have come into this world
cursed with a black skin and have been denied the privilege of
Priesthood and the fullness of the blessings of the Gospel. These are
the descendants of Cain. Moreover, they have been made to feel their
inferiority and have been separated from the rest of mankind from the
beginning.... we will also hope that blessings may eventually be
given to our negro brethren, for they are our brethren-children of
God-not withstanding their black covering emblematical of eternal
darkness. " (Joseph Fielding Smith, The Way to Perfection, pages 101-102)
"Negroes
in this life are denied the Priesthood; under no circumstances can
they hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty. (Abra.
1:20-27.) The gospel message of salvation is not carried
affirmatively to them... negroes are not equal with other races where
the receipt of certain spiritual blessings are concerned,
particularly the priesthood and the temple blessings that flow there
from, but this inequality is not of man's origin. It is the Lord's
doing, is based on his eternal laws of justice, and grows out of the
lack of Spiritual valiance of those concerned in their first estate."
(Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 1966, pp. 527-528)
Considering
these disparaging remarks made by Brigham Young, Wilford Woodruff,
Joseph Fielding Smith, and Bruce R. McConkie (and many others not
quoted here) concerning those of another race (blacks), should these
men be considered true disciples of Christ? Are these men considered
to be in harmony with the teachings of the Church? Did they even know
what they were talking about or just going with the flow of their
day? Or, on the other hand, are they correct and therefore, those who
claim to be and speak as prophets today are actually wrong, mistaken,
and thereby suffer in latter day apostasy?
This may be something to seriously
consider since they definitely contradict each other while claiming
it all came from God. Some of these “prophets” must necessarily
be in error, therefore this belief that they CANNOT lead you astray obviously
is bogus indeed. So, among the latter day “prophets”, who do you
believe and trust? How do you find out?
We'll
pick up here in the next post :)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for posting